Blog
Impressions from the Germany California Solar Day in San Francisco
October 17th, 2010
posted by accessio

I had the the opportunity to be invited by the German American Chamber of Commerce in San Francisco and to moderate the 6th annual Germany California Solar Day last week. The Germany California Solar Day is an annual event that provides German Solar companies a platform to present themselves and their services and technologies to an American audience, as well as provide industry leaders and policy makers a stage to share thoughts and insights into latest market developments and changes in policy.
One common theme in the conference was that Germany’s solar market size dwarfs the US market and that the US market has a lot of catching up to do. Overall consensus was though that the potential for the US solar market is exciting and that market trends are are giving the indication that the rest of 2010 and 2011 should be an exciting year for the solar industry in the North American marketplace. Important factors though that will need to be put in place are the access to financing for utility scale developments, improved schemes to make solar affordable for homeowners through leasing programs or better loans through banks, and that permitting, regulations, and approval processes have to be streamlined and improved. In addition, transmission and interconnection within the current grid will be challenging in some areas and improvements have to be undertaken by utilities and also most likely by project developers of large systems
Interesting for me to see was that even though policy has been set in several states, the US solar thermal market is lagging behind expectations, showing me that there will be a focus on solar thermal within the upcoming months and years as solar heating and cooling should make sense to even the most novice onlooker here in North America.
Speaking to Adam Browning of VoteSolar and also to other experts in the industry, a very concerning issue at hand is the proposed Proposition 23 in California. Supported by Texas Oil companies, Prop23 would negate all the advances made in the California Clean Air Act (AB 32) and effectively kill investments into clean technology and renewable energy for the near to distant future. It would hinder the investment of over 150 clean technology companies currently located in California in the clean technology market as well set a precedent for other states as California is always viewed upon as a thought leader in renewable developments. Please vote No on Prop23 when it comes down to put down your vote in early November and educate yourself about the issue. It is important for the future of renewables in California and the US, a healthy and clean living environment and can help us to steer away of the dangers of oil dependency. Please visit VoteSolar.Org and Stop Dirty Energy.com for further information.
As a next stop Solar Power International is coming to Los Angeles and everybody is gearing up for the biggest Solar Show in the US. It should be bigger and better this year and the excitement is high. Visit us at Booth 2437 in the South Hall!
Boris
Solar development in the most western US state
October 17th, 2010
posted by accessio

I have been out here in Hawaii now for a couple of days and looking at the island with an eye for renewable energy; and I have to say that I am impressed. First of all policy has been set to support renewables.
The Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative (HCEI) signed some major policy initiatives into law in 2009, including a 40% Renewable Portfolio Standard required by 2030, and a 30% (4,300 GWh) Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard, also with the target date of 2030.
Solar thermal water heating was put into a mandate for all new construction starting in 2010, along with the choice of wind, PV, and synthetic gas (the only non-renewable choice). That resulted in virtually all building permits in the last six months included a solar water heater for the areas of Honolulu in Oahu, and the island of Maui and a total adoption rate of solar thermal of 25% across all islands.
Now realizing that policy supports the adoption of alternative means of energy creation it seems to me that public has followed in embracing the technology as well.
It feels good to drive around and see all the houses with solar on their roofs, to go shopping in the grocery store that features a large PV array on their roof, free standing residential PV systems, the public school sporting a large on-roof system and even the local surf shop having a substantial system on their roof (see pictured above).
I am looking forward to the time when all US states provide a similar look and feel driving around.
Aloha and Mahalo
Boris
The Rise of CIGS – Finally? | Renewable Energy World
October 17th, 2010
posted by accessio

Renewable Energy World discusses the world of CIS/CIGS thin film technology. Please follow the link below.
via The Rise of CIGS – Finally? | Renewable Energy World.
Intersolar North America Wrap-Up
October 17th, 2010
posted by accessio
After visiting the flagship Intersolar show in Munich in June the North American edition was not nearly as large, but the focus on North America offered various insights into developments in this very promising market. Production of PV cells, panels and related products and services is ramping up steadily and much of the show was devoted to improving production processes and reaching the sophistication of the semiconductor industry, which was on display around the corner in the other halls of the Moscone Center.
In fact, manufacturers of equipment, devices, materials and software supporting the cell and panel producers were more of a presence than North American thin film and crystalline silicon manufacturers. These are popping up around the United States and Canada, but their presence at the show was marginal, at least as exhibitors.
The upstream focus of Intersolar North America differs from the next big solar show in North America, Solar Power International in Los Angeles from October 12th to 14th, which concentrates more on the downstream installation side of the PV industry. Intersolar North America is 30% bigger than last year, but there is still the sense that the big upswing in North American solar is still ahead of us. Suppliers are jockeying for position in the race to be in a good position when the race really begins. One example is SPARQ Systems Inc. from Kingston, Ontario, a supplier of microinverters. Like other exhibitors at the show, SPARQ took advantage of the publicity provided by the show to launch their product or service offering. Sparq’s microinverters integrate directly with PV panels thereby eliminating the need for a separate DC power handling. They also provide a 25-year warranty for their inverters, which seems quite bold, given that they just launched their product and have limited exposure to real world conditions. On the other hand, as their Communications Manager, Mary Anne Beaudette, mentioned to me at the show, the internal components of the Sparq device are selected and designed in such a way that they are less susceptible to degrade over time compared to competitors like Enphase. The microinverter space will be an interesting one to follow, as is the debate between the microinverter league and the established camp of conventional (centralized) inverter manufacturers.
So there was plenty of innovation on display at the Moscone Center and this was not really a surprise given the show’s location in San Francisco right next to Silicon Valley.
Accessio part of the latest Los Angeles Business Council Session on the recent Solar Feed- in Tariff proposal for the City of LA
October 17th, 2010
posted by accessio

After the unfortunate loss of the German soccer team against Spain I received needed consolation from some of the participants of the recent Los Angeles Business Council (LABC) meeting. The topic centered on the recently published Solar Feed-in Tariff proposal for the city of LA and was well discussed among the session and panel participants. Let me highlight some of the key points from the perspective of our present and potential accessio client base:
1. JR DeShazo, the main author of the LABC/UCLA Feed-in Tariff (FiT) Study ( “Bringing Solar Energy to Los Angeles: An Assessment of the Feasibility and Impacts of an In-basin Solar Feed-in Tariff Program”) and director of the UCLA Luskin School of Innovation, stressed the need for a well designed FiT approach creating a minimum of 600MW solar projects over the next 10 years. In addition such a program would serve as an important engine to attract solar related clean tech manufacturers ( mostly for selected system components, excluding panels) to the LA area and help create more than 11,000 “green” jobs for professional services, system integration and installation, operation and maintenance. Based on the available roof space in the city of LA alone with a potential of 5.5GW, the outlined 600MW program appears with about 10% of the roof space usage to be very achievable and is projected to meet 3% of the City’s future power needs.
2. Craig Lewis, founder of the FiT Coalition – a nonprofit organization that is a leading force in replicating FiTs and other global renewable energy best-practices throughout the United States, painted a future with a much larger Solar PV need. If California wants to achieve its goal of 33% from renewable energy by 2020 ( from its current level of 14%) with PV Solar alone, then based on this simplistic assumption, the PV solar volume need would translate to about 40GW or 4GW/yr over the next 10 years. LA with about 10% of the California power needs would require solar projects in the magnitude of 400MW/yr, far above the proposed 60MW. In conclusion Craig highlighted FiT as the key success factor for implementing a predictable and sustainable PV solar program. He mentioned that 86% of the PV solar deployed worldwide is driven by a FiT program.
3. Jay Carson, Chief Deputy Mayor, office of the Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, pointed out the need for a realistic and pragmatic approach given the present LA City and Department of Water and Power environment. LADWP is the only municipal utility in LA and the largest power utility in the country. LA County is served by other private utilities such as Southern California Edison.
Jay and his team are working on a budget for LADWP to accommodate a FiT program in the magnitude of the proposed project scope without creating the need for any significant rate increase. Such a FiT program should be initiated by LADWP at some modest scope to develop the launching pad for some accelerated implementation speed. Once a long term oriented FiT program catches acceptance, the majority of LA city roof tops could become upgraded with PV solar systems.
In summary, the City of LA and LA County provide a tremendous business opportunity especially for established and new PV solar panel and component suppliers. On this hopeful note I began to feel optimistic again, even forgetting my still stinging soccer pains.
On the Western Side (Puxi) of a Very Large Expo
September 27th, 2010
posted by accessio

After seeing a multitude of Chinese PV and solar thermal manufacturers at last week’s Intersolar, I journeyed to Shanghai a few days ago to visit this year’s Expo (among other things). True to China’s size and growing political and economic clout this Expo is vast with huge pavillons and public areas to fit the onslaught of mainland Chinese visitors. As one German guide to the Hamburg House told me, 99% of visitors are Chinese, leaving a relative trickle of foreign visitors.
Sustainable city development is a key theme of this Expo and there’s no better place to address this issue than in this teeming metropolis of high-rises, elevated highways, modern bridges and subway lines and beautiful new airports and railway stations.
Since I will be back in Shanghai in late August I spent most of today on the western side of the Huangpu river, which divides Shanghai and seperates the older Puxi region from the new Pudong development area. The Huangpu also divides the Expo into a smaller western half and a much bigger eastern half (in Pudong). But despite the smaller size, I had plenty to see and didn’t even cover all the pavillions, mainly bacause the lines at some of the more popular venues (like the GM-SAIC pavillion showcasing this automotive joint venture) were very long.
So the scale is unlike anything we see in Europe and I found the China Railway Pavillion quite amazing with its shiny models of the vast new railway terminals in Shanghai, Beijing, Changsha, Guangzhou and Lhasa in Tibet (the latter was shown in a video on the new Himalayan plateau link between Qinghai and Lhasa).
The energy needs of China are clearly immense, especially if this country keeps on growing at a clip of 8% per year (or more). Equally clear is the need to address environmental concerns and make such growth (with 1.3 billion people and a growing middle class) sustainable. This need was certainly highlighted at the Expo and I was impressed by the candor in one display in a Shanghai city pavillion, where it said that 70% of China’s rivers are polluted and cannot be used for drinking water. On the other hand, there was little mention of specific goals to improve the environmental situation or boost renewables (at least on this side of the Expo) and this contrasted with specific targets I saw in the very eco-friendly Hamburg House (the first certified “Passivhaus” in China!) and other presentations of foreign cities and regions. The Hamburg House uses PV panels on its roof to pump and heat water and supply electricity to the building. Its quite a construction and the restaurant provided a welcome place to regain energy after several kilometers of walking between and up and down pavillions.
On my way out of the western Expo site I stopped in the National Grid and National Railway pavillions where there was plenty of glitz (like the Magic Cube light show put on by the National Grid) but also an emphasis on renewables (especially wind and solar were highlighted in the Grid pavillion) and energy efficiency (for example, in displays showing the rail network and high-speed train development).
I look forward to part 2 of my Expo visit in August and I might have to allocate two full days the next time around. I heard today that lines to the German pavillion are 5 hours long, so I hope that changes for the better by the time I am back. Long lines are not really consistent with this Expo’s byline “better city, better life” but even with this mega space, lines are probably unavoidable with these masses of people eager to glimpse where China (and the rest of this planet) are going.




